By YS Ehoda-Adi Nigeria’s democracy is threatened not just by apathy but by design. The orchestrated fragmentation of opposition...
By YS Ehoda-Adi
Nigeria’s democracy is threatened not just by apathy but by design. The orchestrated fragmentation of opposition coalitions and the ironic state recognition of fringe political parties point to a deliberate narrowing of the political space. What we are witnessing is not natural political evolution, but engineered consolidation by the ruling establishment.
The All Progressives Congress (APC), under President Bola Tinubu, now controls 32 states and a majority in both chambers of the National Assembly. This dominance was not achieved solely at the ballot box. It has been accelerated by induced defections, disconcerting court rulings, and conscious administrative actions that systematically weaken viable alternatives, while elevating politically harmless fragments, or factions and all other elements of disunity.
General warning about Nigeria drifting toward a one-party state or a one-man rule is no longer alarmist. President Tinubu's over-confident and crudely assertive push towards decimating the opposition parties through his usual exultant public denunciation of the opposition clearly betray deliberate anti-democratic posture and design. What else could be the anchor for his triumphalism, outside the deployment of state institutions and/or state resources? And all such deployments of resources, made possible by abuse of incumbency advantages, go to constrain and, most often, castrate the opposition.
Opposition voices are being threatened, co-opted, or drowned out. The line between state institutions and party machinery has blurred, creating a climate where dissent is treated as disloyalty, and pluralism is recast as instability.
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), once Africa’s largest political party, is now shadow of itself. Its collapse has been hastened by sustained targetted pressure from co-occuring external and internal forces.
Labour Party (LP), the surprise of 2023, is now mired in litigation that bears the fingerprints of external interference. Multiple court orders, conflicting claims to chairmanship, and INEC’s selective recognition of factions have turned the party inward. Energy meant for policy and mobilization is spent on survival.
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) illustrates another orchestrated fragmentation tactic: watch for build-up of strength, and then create disunity by procuring and curating ludicrous factions. Once a footnote, the ADC is now courted as a “coalition vehicle” even as it battles extraneously induced internal legitimacy crises.
In these evolving scenarios, citing fringe parties as evidence of multi-party democracy or pluralism or visibility of opposition parties is a feint as it dilutes opposition votes and creates the illusion of choice, while protecting the status quo.
This is the irony. While major opposition parties are starved of oxygen through litigation and regulatory technicalities, fringe political parties (platforms) receive disproportionate airtime, ballot access, and state-level courtesies. The result is a crowded ballot that confuses voters and fractures the anti-incumbent bloc.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) cannot claim neutrality when its actions consistently favor the ruling party in disputes over congresses, primaries, and leadership. Delisting or delays in listing opposition candidates, conflicting pronouncements on party executives, and uneven enforcement of timelines all tilt the field.
State institutions have become instruments of fragmentation. Security agencies invite opposition figures for questioning ahead of key political events. Regulatory bodies flag campaign funding irregularities almost exclusively in opposition camps. Tax authorities and procurement agencies develop sudden interest in businesses linked to dissenting politicians.
The judiciary, meant to be the final arbiter, has contributed to the paralysis. Electoral cases linger until they are moot. Contradictory judgments from courts of coordinate jurisdiction on party leadership create chaos that only benefits incumbents. Justice delayed becomes democracy denied.
Media space reflects the same pattern. State-owned outlets amplify the smallest cracks in opposition coalitions while ignoring major scandals in government. Private broadcasters face licensing threats if their coverage is deemed “inciting.” The result is self-censorship that leaves Nigerians with a monologue, not a debate.
At the subnational level, Houses of Assembly in APC-controlled states swiftly endorse executive actions and suspend opposition lawmakers on flimsy grounds. Local government allocations are released or withheld based on political loyalty, starving opposition councils of funds to perform and then blaming them for non-performance.
The economic hardship facing Nigerians provides cover for this orchestration. With inflation high, unemployment rising, and insecurity persistent, citizens are too preoccupied with survival to organize. Government spin frames every protest as sabotage, every coalition meeting as a threat to national security.
Meanwhile, the Electoral Act 2026 has inbuilt landmines and the protection of ignoble interests of the incumbent government and is being implemented in unethical ways, carelessly neutering the promise of openness or transparency. Provisions for electronic transmission are inconsistently applied. Voter revalidation exercise and/or voter register cleanups target opposition strongholds. Appointments to Resident Electoral Commissioner positions raise questions about impartiality that INEC dismisses without transparency.
The security argument is weaponized. INEC warns of threats to 2027 polls, yet security deployments often intimidate opposition rallies while leaving ruling party events untouched. In volatile states, curfews and bans on gatherings are selectively enforced, disrupting opposition mobilization.
Voter apathy, now at 26% turnout compared to 53% in 2011, is both symptom and strategy. When citizens believe elections are predetermined, they withdraw. A shrunken electorate is easier to manage through patronage, vote buying, and institutional manipulation. Apathy serves incumbency.
The cast of 2027 hopefuls tells the story. President Tinubu has the APC machinery. Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Rotimi Amaechi, and others are in ADC as a coalition vehicle that is already showing signs of extraneously imposed strain. Omoyele Sowore’s AAC and other fringe platforms will further split protest votes.
Some of the coalitions, especially at the sub-national tier, are not failing from ideology or absence of ideological options. Generally, political parties only have markers of difference or distinction mainly in their slates of what to do in office upon attaining victory in elections. And such difference or distinction gets easily blended in a coalition. Therefore, opposition coalitions are being pulled apart by legal landmines, infiltration, and resource asymmetry. Every meeting is surveilled. Every defection is rewarded. Every attempt at merger is met with a fresh court injunction, challenging delegate lists or venue approval.
The APC’s strength is therefore not popularity. It is structural advantage reinforced by state power. When opposition parties must confront odds stacked up by INEC, the courts, security agencies, and the treasury simultaneously, elections cease to be contests and become confirmations of the President's or the ruling party's will.
Nigeria’s democracy cannot survive on the pretence of pluralism. A ballot with 18 political parties means nothing if 15 fringe parties are propped up to fracture the vote and the remaining 2 or so opposition parties are hobbled by the state. True competition requires viable alternatives, not just registered party names.
A robust pathway out of the fragmentation starts with citizens recognizing the orchestration for what it is. Civil society must document and challenge the pattern of institutional bias. The judiciary must decide political cases with speed and consistency. INEC must prove its independence through transparent, evenhanded regulation.
The 2027 elections will test whether Nigerians accept a misdirected/misaligned democracy or demand a real one. Fragmentation can be reversed, but only by deliberate unity of opposition politicians and public pressure. If opposition leaders value individual interest or ambition over principle, they will remain willing tools in their own dismantling.
History will judge this moment harshly if we normalize state-sponsored fragmentation of opposition parties and call it politics. Democracy without competition is authoritarianism by another name. The ironic state recognition of fringe political parties fools no one except those who wish to be fooled.
Orchestrated fragmentation of opposition parties is the most sophisticated form of rigging. It happens before the first ballot is printed. Unless it is confronted now, 2027 will be decided not by free, fair and credible elections, but by the architects of disunity. If that becomes the pattern of the general elections, then the possibility of a third term of office for Tinubu, and the future inauguration of his life presidency would have been so recklessly birthed.
YS Ehoda-Adi
No comments